| Sources |
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Barent Van Rotmers
Barent van Rottmers and Geesje Barents
Long - Van Der Werken Family Tree,
Barent Röttmer (or van Rottmers) married Geesje Barents. They are believed to have come from Altenbruch, Hannover, Preußen, Germany or Otterdorf (about five miles from Altenbruch, also in Hannover). Geesje immigrated to New Netherland on board Den Waterhondt[1], which had sailed from the Texel by 15 June 1640 and had arrived in New Amsterdam by 25 October 1640. By that time, Barent had died and Geesje had married second Pieter Jacobsz van Rynsburgh [2]. According to Lorinne McGinnis Schulze, a joint will was made by Pieter and Geesje in June of 1642. She also states that "Pieter made the first of three payments to the deacons of Fort Orange for an adult funeral pall, on 12 April 1658", probably indicating that Geesje had died in the months preceding the payment.
lordperceval3 d this on 11 Aug 2011
Foray originally submitted this to Jennifer's Family Tree on 19 Feb 2010
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Annetie Barentse VanRotmers
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Barent VanRotmers
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Eva Albertse Bradt cf notes
History
http://www.donnneal.com/vanderpoel-dehooges-post-bradt.html
Johannes was the son of ANTHONY DE HOOGES, one of the leading officials of New Netherland, and EVA ALBERTSE23 {BRADT} DE HOOGES.24 Anthony was born in Noord, a section of Amsterdam, on December 14, 1620. He died in Fort Orange/Rensselaerswyck on or about October 11, 1655. We do not have an exact date of birth for Eva, but as she was baptized in the Lutheran Church in Amsterdam25 on January 9, 1633, it is likely that she was born very late in 1632 or early in the new year. She died, probably in Hurley, New York, as early as 1689 but no later than the first part of 1691 because her second husband, Roelofs Swartwout, married again in late 1691. Eva was probably buried in Hurley.
Anthony and Eva were married, quite probably in Rensselaerswyck, sometime in October of 1647, because there is a record of payment dated October 29, 1647, for services performed at their wedding.26 (The West India Company paid the expenses of the wedding.) It is worth observing that Eva seems to have been just 14 or 15 years of age when she was wed to a man twice her age. Following Anthony's premature death, Eva mortgaged the couple's house and lot in order to create a trust fund for the five children she and Antony had produced. Johannes de Hooges received his share of the proceeds shortly before his marriage to Margaret {Post} de Hooges in 1675.
ronsand31 added this on 5 Nov 2010
Brenda Leavy originally submitted this to Gordon/Leavy on 15 Feb 2009
____________________________________
More-
http://www.donnneal.com/vanderpoel-dehooges-post-bradt.html
Johannes de Hooges's mother Eva was the daughter of ALBERT ANDRIESSEN BRADT27 and his first wife, ANNETIE BARENTSE {VAN ROTMERS} BRADT. Both Albert and Annetie were born about 1607. Annetie died in 1661 - probably fairly early in the year, since the official records in February of that year contain a reference to her funeral pall. She evidently died in Fort Orange or Rensselaerswyck, but we have no information about where she is buried. Annetie's estate was settled on June 6, 1662. Albert died on June 7, 1686. Presumably he is buried in the Lutheran burying ground in Albany.28
This couple recorded their marriage intentions at the Oudekerk (Old Church) in Amsterdam29 on March 27, 1632, and were married there on April 11, 1632 (which was Easter in that year). The Oudekerk was a Reformed church, and it is not clear why the couple - both Lutherans - were married there. It may be that the Lutheran minister was unavailable. Perhaps the couple did not wish to go through a separate civil ceremony at city hall, which would have been the case had they married outside the official, Reformed, faith. Or it may simply be that the Lutheran church, then being constructed, was unsuitable for marriages at this time. We do know that the Bradts later had two children baptized in that Lutheran church and that Albert remained a practicing Lutheran himself (though his children did not), so evidently it was a logistical problem of some sort that caused them to be married in the Oudekerk.30
The Van Rotmers31 family apparently originated on the North Sea coast at the mouth of the Elbe River, just east of Cuxhaven in what is now the German state of Niedersachsen. They are associated with two towns that are called Altenbruch and Otterndorf in German and Oudebroek and Aterendorp in Dutch; we do not know in which of them Annetie was born. From her patronymic, we can tell that her father was named BARENT VAN ROTMERS. Her mother's name was GEESJE32 Barens, who is thought to have been born about 1591.
Annetie's father Barent seems to have died before 1632, as he is never mentioned in the surviving records. At that time her mother, Geesje, was living on Schaepensteegje (Sheep Alley), which is near Rembrandtplein in Amsterdam.33 During the fall of 1640, Geesje Van Rotmers immigrated to New Netherland aboard a ship called den Wagterhondt (The Waterhound). At some point - Bradt family researchers think before she immigrated - she married a gunner at Fort Orange named Pieter Jacobsz van Rynsburch.34 She is thought to have died before April of 1658 and definitely was deceased by 1663.
ronsand31 added this on 5 Nov 2010
Brenda Leavy originally submitted this to Gordon/Leavy on 15 Feb 2009
__________________________________
Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s about Eva Albertse Bratt
Name: Eva Albertse Bratt
Year: 1637
Place: New York, New York
Source Publication Code: 1736
Primary Immigrant: Bratt, Eva Albertse
Annotation: The Yearbook has details of the Society, and on pp. 42-66 is a section entitled "Ancestors and Descendants." This lists original settlers in New York and their progeny. Each original settler arrived between 1624 and 1664. The list changes slightly from ye
Source Bibliography: THE DUTCH SETTLERS SOCIETY OF ALBANY. Yearbook, vol. 45, 1974-1977. Albany, New York: the society, [1977], pp. 42-66.
Page: 43
__________________________
New York City Marriages, 1600s-1800s about Roeloff Swartwout
Name: Roeloff Swartwout
Marriage Date: 1660
Marriage Place: New York City, New York, New York
Self Comments: farmer
Other Comments: On microfilm at Family History Library, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Source: The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record (quarterly), 1884, selected extracts
Publisher: New York Genealogical and Biographical Society
Publication Place: New York, NY
Page: 40
Source Information: Genealogical Research Library, comp.. New York City Marriages, 1600s-1800s [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2005.
Original data: For specific source information see the publication information listed with each entry. Many of the source documents are available in the Genealogical Research Library collection. Many of the records may also be found on microfilm at the Family History Li.
Description: This database is an index to approximately 410,000 individuals who were married in or near New York City in the United States between 1622 and 1899. Information that may be found in this database for each individual includes their name, spouse's name, marriage date, location, and source information.
___________________________
KIP
3- Jacob Kip, born New Amsterdam, Aug. 25, 1666, died Kingston on Feb. 28, 1733. About 1695, he married Rachel Swartwout, daughter of Roelof and Eva (Bradt) Swartwout, born April 10, 1669, died about 1765. Eva Bradt was the daughter of Andries Bradt and his wife, the widow of Anthony deHooges. Their son:
4- Maria Kip, baptised Kingston, Feb. 18, 1709, married Jan Van Benthuysen, son of Barent and Jannetie (Van Wagenen) Van Benthuysen, batptised Kingston, Feb. 6, 1704.
____________________________
from Famous Families...
8- Adam DINGMAN (1645->1721), from Holland;
settled at Greenbush, near Albany, 1693;
m 1676 Aeltie Jacobse (Flodder) Gardiner (d ca 1720;
Jacob Janse Flodder, at Rensselaerwyck, 1638,
m 2d, Barentje Stratsmans);
7- Jacob [Dingman?] (1677-1745), of Kinderhook, NY;
m 1698 Eva Swartwout (d >1745; Roeloff, from Holland, 1657, schout of Esopus, 1660, m 1657, Eva Albertsen Bratt;
Thomas, m 1630, Adrientje Symonds);
6- Andrew (1711-1801), pioneer Dingmans Choice, PA;
m 1740, Cornelia Kermer (b 1720; Dirk [b 1697],
m Eva, dau. of Hendrick Schoonover,
m Cornelia Swartwout;
Isaac, m Kyntje Keyser;
Abraham, from Germany, m 1656, Melje Davis);
5- Andrew (1753-1839), Dingmans Choice; Am. Rev.;
m 1774, Jenneke Westbrook;
4- Daniel Westbrook (1775-1862), mem. PA Legislature, 1808-14; judge 28 yrs;
m 1795, Mary Westbrook;
3- Andrew (1803-89), m 1825, Caroline E. Sayre;
2- Mary (2 below)
___________________
 |
First Families of America
|
 |
First Families of America, cropped for DINGMAN
8- Adam DINGMAN (1645->1721), from Holland; settled at Greenbush, near Albany, 1693; m 1676 Aeltie Jacobse (Flodder) Gardiner (d ca 1720; Jacob Janse Flodder, at Rensselaerwyck, 1638, m 2d, Barentje Stratsmans); 7- Jacob [Dongman?] (1677-1745), of Kinderhook, NY; m 1698 Eva Swartwout (d >1745; Roeloff, from Holland, 1657, schout… |
 |
Jacob Kip marries Rachel Swartwout, son Maria Kip marries Jan van Benthuysen- Van Benthuysen genealogy
Jacob Kip marries Rachel Swartwout, son Maria Kip marries Jan van Benthuysen- Van Benthuysen genealogy: KIP- 3- Jacob Kip, born New Amsterdam, Aug. 25, 1666, died Kingston on Feb. 28, 1733. About 1695, he married Rachel Swartwout, daughter of Roelof and Eva (Bradt) Swartwout, born April 10, 1669, died about 1765. Eva Bradt was the daughter… |
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Albert Andriessen Bradt
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Albert Andriessen Bradt cf 'notes' for interesting background
Life story (Anriessen BRADT)
Inasmuch as there were eight children born to Andriessen and his wife, Storm being the third, two of their children, Barent and Eva, were likely with their parents on this voyage. Five of their children were born in the new world: Engeltje, Gisseltje, Andries, Jan and Dirck
Andriessen and his partners were to operate a mill. But not long after his arrival he took the liberty of dissolving partnership and established himself as a tobacco planter. Van Renssselaer had sent greetings to him in a letter dated September 21, 1637, (addressed to the partner of Andriessen, Pieter Cornelisz, master millwright) but in a subsequent letter, of May 8, 1638, to Cornelisz he wrote: "Albert Andriessen separated from you, I hear that he is a strange character, and it is therefore no wonder that he could not get along with you."6 Nevertheless, Van Rensselaer entertained the hope that Albert Andriessen would succeed as a tobacco planter. On December 29, 1637, he wrote to Director William Kieft that he should assign some of the young men on board the "Calmar Sleutel", commanded by Pieter Minuit and sailing in the same month, to tobacco planting with Aiidriessen "if he has good success," otherwise they were to serve with the farmers.
These young men were inexperienced, it seems. One, Elbert Elbertz, from Nieukerck, eighteen years old, was a weaver; Claes Jansen, from the same place, seventeen years old, was a tailor; Gerrit Hendricksz, also from the same place, fifteen year old, was a shoemaker. Gerrit must have served Andriessen for a term of at least three years; for his first three years' wages, from April 2, 1638 to April 2, 1641, are charged to Andriessen.
In a letter of May 10, 1638, Van Rensselaer advised Andriessen that he had duly received his letter stating that the tobacco looked fine. But he was desirous to get full particulars as to how the crop had turned out, and to get a sample of the tobacco. He expressed dissatisfaction at Andriessen having separated from Pieter Cornelisz, and liked to know the cause of his dispute with the officer and commis Jacob Albertsz Planck and his son. He informed Andriessen that he was obliged to uphold his officers. and promised him to stand by him and cause him to be "provided with everything." But he would not suffer bad behavior. He also informed him that it was apparent from the news he had received from several people that he was "very unmerciful to his children and very cruel" to his wife; he was to avoid this "and in all things have the fear of the Lord" before his eyes and not follow so much his own inclinations. But there was also another matter for which Van Rensselaer censured him: he had traded beaver furs with Dirck Corszen Stam contrary to contract, defrauded and cheated him. For seven pieces of duffel he had given him only the value of twenty-five merchantable beavers.
Van Rensselaer also addressed a letter, of the same date, to Jacob Albertsz Planck informing him that he had written to Andriessen that he should have more respect for the officers. Planck was instructed to notify Andriessen and all others living in the colony not to engage in "such detrimental fur trade," for he did not care to suffer in his colony those who had their eyes mainly on the fur trade.'
Notwithstanding, it was Dirck Corszen that was an unfaithful supercargo. And Van Rensselaer requested, in a letter of May 13, 1639, of Andriessen, that he should write him the truth of the matter and pay him what he still owed Corszen. If he saw that Andriessen acted honestly herein, he would do all in his power to help him. Andriessen should go to the superintendent of the colony, Arent van Curler, and purchase necessaries for himself and his own people at an advance in price of 50 per cent. He should get merchandise for the Indian trade at an advance of 75 per cent. In return he was to furnish Van Curler with skins at such a price that he could make something on the transaction.
Van Rensselaer also informed Andriessen that he would try to sell his tobacco at the highest price and furthermore give him 25 per cent more than his half of the net proceeds would amount to. He would moreover grant him 25 per cent discount on the grain which he bought. In fact, Van Rensselaer's confidence in Andriessen seemed to be increasing. For he not only acknowledged that he had received several letters from him, but also wished to say to his credit that he had received returns from no one. but him. He complained, however, of the tobacco which had been sent to him in barrels. It was a great loss to both that the "tobacco was so poor and thin of leaf that it could not stand being rolled." This. he thought, was likely due to Andriessen having left too many leaves on the plants. But not this alone: the weight was short. One barrel, put down at 292 lbs., weighed but 220 lbs. This was perhaps due to deception on the part of a certain Herman, a furrier. But anything like this should be avoided in the future. The tobacco amounted to 1,156 pounds net, which was sold for 8 st. (16 cents) a pound. Had it not been so bad and wretched, it could have been sold for twenty cents a pound. A higher price could be obtained if Andriessen would be more careful in the future and leave fewer leaves on the plants. He should try to grow "good stuff", for the tobacco from St. Christopher, an island in the West Indies, was so plentiful in Netherland that it brought but 3 stivers a pound. Andriessen should also each year make out a complete account of all expenses and receipts from tobacco, so Van Rensselaer could see whether any progress was made.
But Andriessen was a poor accountant. Neither Van Rensselaer nor his nephew, the former Director Van Twiller, could understand his accounts.1' Van Rensselaer therefore gave him directions to follow in making his entries and statements, claimingthat any other procedure would "leave everything confused and mixed up." He complained that Andriessen laid certain transactions before the patroon, which should be laid before the cornmis. He expressed the sentiment that Andriessen was making him his servant when he wrote to him "about soap and other things." He also complained that Andriessen caused great loss by making him hold the tobacco too high: it was safest to follow the market price in Netherland. Finally he censured him for buying unwisely - he had paid f. 200 for a heifer, "which is much too high." is The patroon and Andriessen had several disagreements.
The latter, with his brother Arent Andriessen, sent to the patroon sometime in 1642, 4,484 lbs. of tobacco. It was sold on an average of eight and one half st. a lb. Deducting 270 lbs. for stems, the net weight brought a sum of f. 1790:19. But the duty, freight charges, and convoy charges amounted to f. 629:15. The patroon said he would deduct only half of this if Andriessen compensated him according to his ordinance for his land on which the tobacco grew. But as long as he was in dispute with him he would deduct the whole sum. Andriessen did not suffer. Van Rensselaer complained in letter of March 16, 1643, to Arent van Curler that he did not know what privilege Albert Andriessen had received, since "his cows are not mentioned in the inventory sent him." He stated he would not want any one, no matter who he was, to own any animals which were not subject to the right of pre-emption. Therefore, Curler should include Andriessen's animals in the inventory, or make him leave the colony and pay for pasturing and hay during the past year
In September 5, 1643, the patroon stipulated the following with respect to Andriessen, whose term had long before expired without his having obtained a new lease or contract.
He "shall . . . be continued for the present but shall not own live stock otherwise than according to the general rule of one half of the increase belonging to the patroon and of the right of preemption and, in case he does not accept this, his cattle shall immediately be sent back to the place whence they came, with the understanding, however, that half of the increase bred in the colony shall go to the patroon in consideration of the pasturage and hay which they have used; and as to his accounts he shall also be obliged to close, liquidate and settle the same; and as far as the conditions after the expiration of his lease are concerned, the patroon adopts for him as well as for all others this fixed rule, of which they must all be notified and if they do not wish to continue under it must immediately leave the colony, namely, that every freeman who has a house and garden of his own shall pay an annual rent of 5 stivers per Rhineland rod and for land used in raising tobacco, wheat or other fruits 20 guilders per Rhineland morgen, newly cleared land to be free for a number of years, more or less, according to the amount of labor required in such clearing.
Andriessen not only cultivated tobacco. He operated "two large sawmills," run by a "powerful waterfall," worth as much as f. 1000 annual rent, but the patroon let him have them for f. 250 annual rent. 17 From May 4, 1652, to May 4, 1672, Andriessen is charged with the annual rent for these two mills and the land on Norman's Kill. 18 Originally this Kill was called Tawasentha, meaning a place of the many dead. The Dutch appelative of Norman's Kill is derived from Andriessen.
In New Amsterdam he had acquired a house and lot from Hendrick Kip, August 29, 1651. It lay northeast of fort Amsterdam." Under date of October 5, 1655, we find that he was taxed fi. 20 for this house and lot.
In May, 1655, before the court of the Burgomasters and Schepens in New Amsterdam, Roeloff Jansen, a butcher, appeared and made a complaint against Christiaen Barentsen, attorney for Andriessen. Jansen had leased a house and some land belonging to Andriessen who was to give him some cows. But the house was not tight" and "not enclosed," and the cows were missing. might still suffer. The defendant, as attorney for Andriessen, replied that it was not his fault that the demand had not been complied with according to the contract. He requested time to. write to his principal about it. The Court granted him a month's time in which to do this. In due time, however, the court ruled that Andriessen should make the necessary repairs.
Some years later, Simon Clasen Turck started a suit against Andriessen, of which we shall let the court minutes of New Amsterdam speak:
[August 19, 16591. "Simon Turck, pltf., vs. Dirck van Schelluyne as att'y of Albert Andriessen, deft. Deft, in default. Symon Turck produces in Court in writing his demand against Albert Andriessen concluding, that the attachment on the two cows grazing with Wolfert Webber shall stand good and have its full effect, until the said Albert Andriessen shall have paid him his arrears to the amount of fi. 2, sent to him by Joris Jans Rapalje Ao. 1649, the 3d Septr. in the absence of Pieter Cornelissen, millwright, decd., not accounted for nor made good by him." The attachment on the cows is declared valid by the Court.22
[August 19]. "Dirck van Schelluyne in quality as att'y for Albert Andriessen Noorman, answers demand of Symon Clasen Turck. The court orders copy to be furnished to party to answer thereunto at the next Court day."23
[September 2]. "Symon Clasen Turck replies to answer of Dirck van Schelluyne, att'y of Albert Andriessen. Court orders copy to be furnished to party to rejoin at the next court day,"24
[September 23]. "Tielman van Vleeck as att'y for Turck requests by petition, that Sybout Clazen shall be ordered to deliver by the next Court day his papers used against the abovenamed Symon Turck; also that Dirck van Schelluyne, att'y of Albert Andriessen, shall be ordered to rejoin to Symon Turck's reply.
Apostille : Petitioner's request is granted, and parties shall be ordered to prosecute their suit by the next court day.
"On date 17th January 1660, has Dirck van Schelluyne furnished me Secretary Joannes Nevius, his rejoinder, and demand in reconvention, as attorney of Albert Andriessen against Tielman van Vleec, att'y of Symon Clazen Turck, also rejoinder of Abra ham Verplanck against ditto Van Vleeck as substitute of Anthony Clasen More: Whereupon the President of the Burgomasters and Schepens ordered: Copy hereof to be furnished to party, and parties are ordered to exchange their papers with each other and to produce their deductions and principal intendit by inventory on the next Court day."
On January 22, 1660, the Burgomasters and Schepens dismissed the "pltfs. suit instituted herein" and condemned him to pay the costs incurred in this suit.
But a few days later, on January 28, 1660, it rendered the following decision: "Burgomasters and Schepens of the City of Amsterdam in N: Netherland having considered, read and reread the vouchers, documents and papers used on both sides in the suit between Tielman van Vleeck attorney of Simon Clasen Turck, (as husband and guardian of Merretje Pieters, daughter of the dec[eas]d Pieter Cornelissen, millwright, and his lawful heir, as well for himself as representing herein the orphan child of Tryntie Pieters, deceased daughter of said Pieter Cornelissen) pltf. against Dirck Van Schelluyne, attorney of Albert Andriessen Noorman, residing at Fort Orange, deft. relative to and concerning two hundred guilders, which Symon Clasen Turck is demanding from Albert Andriesen for so much, that Albert Andriesen has received from Jorsey in the absence of Pieter Comelissen, millwright, dated 3rd September, 1649, gone to Virginia and not computed by him nor made good as appears by contract made between Albert Andriessen and Symon Clasen Turck by the intermediation of - Corlear and Dirck van Schelluyne according to acte thereof executed before D: V. Hamel, Secretary of the Colony of Reinselaars Wyck, dated 27th September, 1658; and whereas the words of the contract read as follows :-
' Firstly, Symon Turck shall collect, receive, retain and dispose of as his own according to his pleasure, all outstanding debts receivable, wherever they be; all effects and goods found in the house of the deceased Pieter Cornelissen, whether belonging to him individually or to his Company or Association; On the other hand, Albert Andriesen assumes himself all the debts payable where and to whomsoever they may be, relating to their partnership, whether these stand in the name of Pieter Cornelissen or his own name. promises to release Symon Turck from all claims relating hereunto.' - having looked into, examined and weighed everything material, Burgomasters and Schepens find it right, that the pltf's demand be dismissed, inasmuch as they find, that the two hundred guilders were not to be received, but were paid several years since to Joris Rapalj e, who sent the same to Albert Andriesen Noorman and are accordingly not payable to the estate of Pieter Cornelissen, but whenever Symon Turck or his attorney can prove that, at the time of the settlement of accounts and writing of the contract, Albert Andriesen Noorman notified Symon Turck, that he should receive the 11. 200., hereinbefore in question, from Sybout Clasen, then Albert Andriesen shall give and pay the above mentioned fi. 200., with costs, and in default of proof the pltf. is condemned in the costs of the suit. Regarding the demand in reconvention about certain planks, no disposition can be made therein as the same is moved according to the Lites Contest atio. Thus done and adjudged by the Burgomaster and Schepens of the City of Amsterdam in New Netherland as above.
" Adj. as above
" Martin Kregier."
The court minutes under date of June 8, 1660, regarding this litigation, state:
" On petition of Tielman Van Vleeck, attorney for Symon Clasen Turck, wherein he requests that the Court may not only examine, but also expedite the solution given by him relative to the fulfillment of the interlocutory judgment pronounced 28th January last, it is ordered :-Copy of the solution shall be furnished to party to answer thereunto at the next Court day.
And under date of January 29, 1661, the minutes pertaining to this case read: "On the petition of Tielman van Vleeck, agent of Symon Clasen Turck, wherein he requests, as Albert Andriesen Noorman remains in default, to answer the solution given in to Court on the 8th of June 1660, that the above named Albert Andries(e)n shall in contumacy be condemned to pay him petitioner the computed two hundred guilders remaining due to him; Whereupon was ordered: The petitioner shall notify his party hereof according to law before June 5, 1662.
" Appeared before me Robert Livingston, secretary etc., and in presence of the honorable Messieurs Philip Schuyler and Dirck Wessells, commisaries etc., Albert Andriese Bratt, who acknowledged that he is well and truly indebted and in arrears to Mr. Nicolaus Van Renselaer, director of colony of Renselaerswyck, in the sum of 3,956 guilders, as appears by the books of the colony of Renselaerswyck, growing out of the part rent for the mill and land; which aforesaid 3,956 guilders the mortgagor, to the aforenamed Mr. Director or to his successors, promise to pay, provided that whatever he, the mortgagor shall make appear to have been paid thereon shall be deducted: pledging therefor, specially, the produce of his orchard, standing behind the house which the mortgagor now possesses, from which produce of the orchard he promises to pay in rent during life twenty guilders in patroon's money in apples, and generally pledging his person and estate, personal and real, present and future, nothing excepted; submitting the same to the force of all laws and judges to promote the payment thereof in due time, if need be, without loss or cost.
"Done in Albany, without craft or guile, on the 30th of October, 1677.
"Aalbert Andriess Brat.
"Philip Schuyler.
"Dirck Wessels.
"Acknowledged before me,
"Robt. Livingstone, Secr.
Albert Andriessen died June 7, 1686
anne gutierrez added this on 11 Sep 2010
mezzojess originally submitted this to Jessica Family Tree on 25 Sep 2007Source: Olive Tree Genealogy
 |
Bradt's Sawmill on Normanskill Creek
Bradt's Sawmill on Normanskill Creek anne gutierrez added this on 11 Sep 2010 aten0000 originally submitted this to Ward Family Tree on 3 Jul 2010 |
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Eva Albertse Bradt
 |
Roelof and Eva Swartout First Lord's Supper Memorial Plaque
Roelof and Eva Swartout First Lord's Supper Memorial Plaque 26 December 1660 , Dutch Reformed Church, Kingston, New York BRaynis added this on 9 Jun 2011 mfmssm74 originally submitted this to Dutch Cousins Family Tree on 20 Jun 2010 Photo Roelof and Eva were members of the Dutch Reformed Church in Kingston, NY. They were present at the… |
|
1611 - 1662 (51 years)
[1, 3, 4] 
