| Sources |
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Andries Arentse Bradt Four stories in Notes.
Life (Arent Andriesz Bradt)
He sailed from Texal on the coast of Holland in the vessel Rensselaerwyck, built in Manhattan. He arrived at New Amsterdam
Occupation: Brewer
Religion: Lutheran
FACT: Friend and companion of Arent Van Curler. 3
FACT: Labeled by the Court of Fort Orange and Beverwyck to be one of the most properous and loyal citizens
Lease of Land on Island Opposite Beverwyck to Arent Andriesz, May 1, 1658: Copy This day, the 1st of May 1658, Mr Ian Baptist van Rensselaer director of the colony of Rensselaerswyck, has agreed and contracted with Arent Adriessen, about the lease of all the tilled land on the island opposite the center of the village of Beverwyck with all the land which he can further obtain from the natives of this country, with the exception of land already cultivated by the honorable van Rensselaer which his honor keeps for himself, and this for the sum of 100 guilders a year besides tithes and two fowls as toepacht, to be paid in good wheat and oats, the wheat to a mudde and in case the lessee should be prevented from using the obligations of the lease and not pay for such period as he does not have the use of the said land. The lease shall continue for the space of four years commencing today. In testimony whereof, Mr Rensslaer and Arent aforesaid have confirmed this with their signatures, without fraud; in R. Wyck, date as above. Was signed : J:B: van Rensselaer, Arent Andries. Below was written: In my presence D V Hamel, Secretary. This copy agrees with the original, which I certify, [signed] D:V: Hamel, Secretary.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, 09 Jun 1654
Arent van den Bergh, plaintiff, against Arent Andriesz, defendant, on account of a dispute about a gun for which the plaintiff paid a certain sum in hand and which the defendant claims to be his gun.
The court is of opinion that the gun must be restored, provided the defendant bears part of the expense, as is proper.
CCarter50 added this on 15 Feb 2011
ChristineRamsauer originally submitted this to Ramsauer Family Tree on 16 Jan 2008
______________________________________
Andries Arentse Bradt
Andries Bradt was born 1578 in Fredrikstad, Smaalenes, Ostfold, Norway. The name of his spouse was Aefje (Eva) Kinetis b: 1584 in Fredrikstad, Smaalenes (Ostfold), Norway. Andries parents were Arent Bradt b 1549 and Catalytje de Vos. Reference - Rootsweb.com #ID: I606665602 by Bradley Maloney.
Andries and Aefje had two sons, Albertse and Arent. They came from Norway to Holland via the Hensiac League. They left the Texal coast of Holland on September 25th, 1636 on "The Arms of the Rensaalearwych". They were registered on the ship as "Bratt". They arrived at the port of New York (New Netherland). Later on April 7, 1637, they moved to Rensselaerswyck (Albany N.Y.) and then to Scenectady N.Y. Arent was one of the first proprietors in that area which is confirmed by records that his shop was located on the west quarter block bounded by Washington, Union Church and State streets. Arent was also nominated on March 30, 1655 for commissioner of New Amsterdam, Fort Orange and Beverwick.
CCarter50 added this on 15 Feb 2011
susasoul originally submitted this to Wilcox and allied Families on 1 Aug 2008
____________________________________________
Forts & Fireplaces of the Mohawk Valley
John Vrooman, who wrote "Forts & Fireplaces of the Mohawk Valley" wrote that "Arent Andriesz Bradt died in 1662 at Rensselerwyck, New York, leaving a widow, three sons & three daughters. He states that two brothers came early to this country from their home in the southeastern part of Norway. Albert & Arent were on the ship Rensselaerwyck, sailing from Amsterdam to New Netherlands and return (9/25/1636 to 11/7/1637).
The Bradt's as a family were in the brewing business, with their brew house located on their property. The farm lands of this family were widely scattered, some of it was just east of the village along the Mohawk, some as far away as Niskayuna, and they received their interest as representatives of one of the original settlers in the "Great Flat". Their part of the lasn was in what was later known as Rotterdam.
CCarter50 added this on 15 Feb 2011
pahucki originally submitted this to Pahucki Tree on 26 Dec 2006
_____________________________
death in indian attack, 1690, Schenectady
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF THOSE KILLED AND TAKEN CAPTIVE ON THAT NIGHT. In addition to the soldiers in the fort, those recorded as being killed in the massacre were:
Myndert Wemp,
Jan Dirkse Van Eps and three children,
Barent Janse Van Ditmars and his son, Cornelis,
Andries Arentse Bradt and one child,
Maria Viele (wife of Douw Aukes),two children,
Mary Aloff (wife of Cornelis Viele, Jr.)
Sweer Teunises Van Velsen, his wife,
Antje Janse Spoor,
Hendrick Meese Vrooman,
Bartholomew Vrooman (father and brother of Adam),
Gerrit Marcellis, wife and child,
Robert Hesselingh,
Sander Van Brakel,
Jan Roeloffse,
David Christoffalse, his wife and four children,
Joris Aertse Van der Bast,
Willem Pieterse,
Jan Poetman and wife,
Domine Thessenmaecker,
Frans Harmense Van de Bogart,
Engeltje Vrooman and infant child,
Rynier Shaets and son,
Johannes son of Symon Schermerhoorn.
The following are recorded as having been taken prisoners:
Isaac Swits and son Cornelis, Johannes Teller,
John Wemp (son of Myndert Wemp above), Symon,
Abraham, Philip,
Dyrck and Claas Groot, all five sons of Symon Groot Sr .
Jan Baptist Van Eps son of Jan Dirkse Van Eps, Albert and Johannes Vedder, sons of Harmon Vedder,
Arnout Janse, Barent Vrooman, son of Adam. Claas son of Harmens Van de Bogart.
Most of the captives were returned to the valley from one to seven years captivity.
Bolded sons taken are from another branch of the family- Symon is our gr-grandfather (Jan Hutinger?-jcw 08.10.2011)
The Fate of Schenectady
In the 1600's, a young man came to America from Holland aboard the ship "Prince Mauritz" as a boatswain. His name was Symon Symonse Groot. He was the start of our Groot/Groat family. Symon married a young lady that he met while living in Fort Orange (which is now known as Albany, NY). Her name was Rebecca du Truiex, she was a pretty young maid and Symon was "taken" with her right away. At least that is what I would like to think. Rebecca's dad was the court messenger of New Amsterdam (which was NY City). They lived in Albany a short time after their marriage, and then moved to Beverwyck (today is known as Schenectady, NY, which means a place beyond the pines). They moved to an area that is now known as the "Stockade" where they owned quite a bit of land. They had 6 sons and 3 daughters. They were farmers and church going people.
The fate of Schenectady was sealed in the middle of January, 1690, when 114 Frenchmen and 96 Sault and Algonquin Indians, started from Montreal to attack English outpost to the south. It was part of the master plan to fulfill the wishes of French King Louis XIV to "build a new empire in America". They came down the frozen ice on Lake Champlain and in about six days, down to a point that is known today as Fort Edward, it was here where they met with the Indian leaders and decided to attack Schenectady instead of Fort Orange.
They continued on down and crossed the icy Mohawk. It was then that spies were sent to scout the Stockade and see if it was secured. Seeing the doors open, and no one guarding them, they reported back to their leaders, and the decision was made to attack. February 9, 1690, during the raid on Schenectady many men, women and children were killed, (which you will find a list of the names at the bottom of this page). Symon and Rebecca's 5 sons, Symon, Dyrk, Abraham, Claas and Philip (Cornelius died when just a young boy) were taken captive by the French and Indians and marched up into Canada. Symon and Rebecca were not in Schenectady at the time of the massacre, they had gone to Albany to attend a Baptism. Imagine their fright when they got the news of what had happend.
The people of Schenectady were secure in their feelings that nobody would go out on such a night like this, freezing cold and so much snow. Most had gone off to bed and were sleeping. A night like this not even the foolhardy Frenchmen would be out. Now why the gates to the fort were not closed is a question no one at this time can answer. Some say that maybe they were so sure that no one would be out they just got careless, and others say maybe the gates were frozen open and they could not be closed. Whatever the reason they were left open and what happend during the night shall always be remembered by all Schenectadians. The half-frozen invaders crossed the river on the windswept ice and soon were inside the stockade.
Suddenly the high-pitched war cries of the warriors split the silence, the signal for a bloody massacre that was to last for two full hours.
Houses were quickly put to the torch and the people who came out in the night were tomahawked and their scalps were taken or they were shot. Symon Schermerhorn though wounded mounted a horse and rode to Albany to tell them of the French invasion and to try and get some help. That morning the French rounded up their prisoners and started back to Canada. As they passed by Scotia, Glen Sander was able to help, he was told that he would be able to choose his relatives from among the prisoners in return for having been kind to some French captives when they were in the hands of the Mohawks a few years earlier. He tried to claim as many as he could without arousing their suspicions. About 60 persons were killed outright, including 10 women and 12 children. And some were taken prisoner. As mentioned above Symon and Rebecca's sons were some of those taken captive. All the sons did return to Schenectady after a years time, except Claas, and we are not sure what happened to Claas. There are many stories as to what did happen to Class but nobody knows for sure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This poem written by Walter Wilie on June 12, 1690. It was written 4 months after the Massacre.
CCarter50 added this on 15 Feb 2011
janhutinger originally submitted this to hutinger Family Tree on 26 Apr 2008
 |
bradt_house-201_original
bradt_house-201_original CCarter50 added this on 15 Feb 2011 lee200300 originally submitted this to Bowen on 15 Jan 2011 |
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Albert Andriessen Bradt
- [S394] Ancestry.com, Public Member Trees, (Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006;), Database online., Skinner/Schinzel-Ahlemeyer/Haines Tree J_Ahlemeyer.
Record for Albert Andriessen Bradt cf 'notes' for interesting background
Life story (Anriessen BRADT)
Inasmuch as there were eight children born to Andriessen and his wife, Storm being the third, two of their children, Barent and Eva, were likely with their parents on this voyage. Five of their children were born in the new world: Engeltje, Gisseltje, Andries, Jan and Dirck
Andriessen and his partners were to operate a mill. But not long after his arrival he took the liberty of dissolving partnership and established himself as a tobacco planter. Van Renssselaer had sent greetings to him in a letter dated September 21, 1637, (addressed to the partner of Andriessen, Pieter Cornelisz, master millwright) but in a subsequent letter, of May 8, 1638, to Cornelisz he wrote: "Albert Andriessen separated from you, I hear that he is a strange character, and it is therefore no wonder that he could not get along with you."6 Nevertheless, Van Rensselaer entertained the hope that Albert Andriessen would succeed as a tobacco planter. On December 29, 1637, he wrote to Director William Kieft that he should assign some of the young men on board the "Calmar Sleutel", commanded by Pieter Minuit and sailing in the same month, to tobacco planting with Aiidriessen "if he has good success," otherwise they were to serve with the farmers.
These young men were inexperienced, it seems. One, Elbert Elbertz, from Nieukerck, eighteen years old, was a weaver; Claes Jansen, from the same place, seventeen years old, was a tailor; Gerrit Hendricksz, also from the same place, fifteen year old, was a shoemaker. Gerrit must have served Andriessen for a term of at least three years; for his first three years' wages, from April 2, 1638 to April 2, 1641, are charged to Andriessen.
In a letter of May 10, 1638, Van Rensselaer advised Andriessen that he had duly received his letter stating that the tobacco looked fine. But he was desirous to get full particulars as to how the crop had turned out, and to get a sample of the tobacco. He expressed dissatisfaction at Andriessen having separated from Pieter Cornelisz, and liked to know the cause of his dispute with the officer and commis Jacob Albertsz Planck and his son. He informed Andriessen that he was obliged to uphold his officers. and promised him to stand by him and cause him to be "provided with everything." But he would not suffer bad behavior. He also informed him that it was apparent from the news he had received from several people that he was "very unmerciful to his children and very cruel" to his wife; he was to avoid this "and in all things have the fear of the Lord" before his eyes and not follow so much his own inclinations. But there was also another matter for which Van Rensselaer censured him: he had traded beaver furs with Dirck Corszen Stam contrary to contract, defrauded and cheated him. For seven pieces of duffel he had given him only the value of twenty-five merchantable beavers.
Van Rensselaer also addressed a letter, of the same date, to Jacob Albertsz Planck informing him that he had written to Andriessen that he should have more respect for the officers. Planck was instructed to notify Andriessen and all others living in the colony not to engage in "such detrimental fur trade," for he did not care to suffer in his colony those who had their eyes mainly on the fur trade.'
Notwithstanding, it was Dirck Corszen that was an unfaithful supercargo. And Van Rensselaer requested, in a letter of May 13, 1639, of Andriessen, that he should write him the truth of the matter and pay him what he still owed Corszen. If he saw that Andriessen acted honestly herein, he would do all in his power to help him. Andriessen should go to the superintendent of the colony, Arent van Curler, and purchase necessaries for himself and his own people at an advance in price of 50 per cent. He should get merchandise for the Indian trade at an advance of 75 per cent. In return he was to furnish Van Curler with skins at such a price that he could make something on the transaction.
Van Rensselaer also informed Andriessen that he would try to sell his tobacco at the highest price and furthermore give him 25 per cent more than his half of the net proceeds would amount to. He would moreover grant him 25 per cent discount on the grain which he bought. In fact, Van Rensselaer's confidence in Andriessen seemed to be increasing. For he not only acknowledged that he had received several letters from him, but also wished to say to his credit that he had received returns from no one. but him. He complained, however, of the tobacco which had been sent to him in barrels. It was a great loss to both that the "tobacco was so poor and thin of leaf that it could not stand being rolled." This. he thought, was likely due to Andriessen having left too many leaves on the plants. But not this alone: the weight was short. One barrel, put down at 292 lbs., weighed but 220 lbs. This was perhaps due to deception on the part of a certain Herman, a furrier. But anything like this should be avoided in the future. The tobacco amounted to 1,156 pounds net, which was sold for 8 st. (16 cents) a pound. Had it not been so bad and wretched, it could have been sold for twenty cents a pound. A higher price could be obtained if Andriessen would be more careful in the future and leave fewer leaves on the plants. He should try to grow "good stuff", for the tobacco from St. Christopher, an island in the West Indies, was so plentiful in Netherland that it brought but 3 stivers a pound. Andriessen should also each year make out a complete account of all expenses and receipts from tobacco, so Van Rensselaer could see whether any progress was made.
But Andriessen was a poor accountant. Neither Van Rensselaer nor his nephew, the former Director Van Twiller, could understand his accounts.1' Van Rensselaer therefore gave him directions to follow in making his entries and statements, claimingthat any other procedure would "leave everything confused and mixed up." He complained that Andriessen laid certain transactions before the patroon, which should be laid before the cornmis. He expressed the sentiment that Andriessen was making him his servant when he wrote to him "about soap and other things." He also complained that Andriessen caused great loss by making him hold the tobacco too high: it was safest to follow the market price in Netherland. Finally he censured him for buying unwisely - he had paid f. 200 for a heifer, "which is much too high." is The patroon and Andriessen had several disagreements.
The latter, with his brother Arent Andriessen, sent to the patroon sometime in 1642, 4,484 lbs. of tobacco. It was sold on an average of eight and one half st. a lb. Deducting 270 lbs. for stems, the net weight brought a sum of f. 1790:19. But the duty, freight charges, and convoy charges amounted to f. 629:15. The patroon said he would deduct only half of this if Andriessen compensated him according to his ordinance for his land on which the tobacco grew. But as long as he was in dispute with him he would deduct the whole sum. Andriessen did not suffer. Van Rensselaer complained in letter of March 16, 1643, to Arent van Curler that he did not know what privilege Albert Andriessen had received, since "his cows are not mentioned in the inventory sent him." He stated he would not want any one, no matter who he was, to own any animals which were not subject to the right of pre-emption. Therefore, Curler should include Andriessen's animals in the inventory, or make him leave the colony and pay for pasturing and hay during the past year
In September 5, 1643, the patroon stipulated the following with respect to Andriessen, whose term had long before expired without his having obtained a new lease or contract.
He "shall . . . be continued for the present but shall not own live stock otherwise than according to the general rule of one half of the increase belonging to the patroon and of the right of preemption and, in case he does not accept this, his cattle shall immediately be sent back to the place whence they came, with the understanding, however, that half of the increase bred in the colony shall go to the patroon in consideration of the pasturage and hay which they have used; and as to his accounts he shall also be obliged to close, liquidate and settle the same; and as far as the conditions after the expiration of his lease are concerned, the patroon adopts for him as well as for all others this fixed rule, of which they must all be notified and if they do not wish to continue under it must immediately leave the colony, namely, that every freeman who has a house and garden of his own shall pay an annual rent of 5 stivers per Rhineland rod and for land used in raising tobacco, wheat or other fruits 20 guilders per Rhineland morgen, newly cleared land to be free for a number of years, more or less, according to the amount of labor required in such clearing.
Andriessen not only cultivated tobacco. He operated "two large sawmills," run by a "powerful waterfall," worth as much as f. 1000 annual rent, but the patroon let him have them for f. 250 annual rent. 17 From May 4, 1652, to May 4, 1672, Andriessen is charged with the annual rent for these two mills and the land on Norman's Kill. 18 Originally this Kill was called Tawasentha, meaning a place of the many dead. The Dutch appelative of Norman's Kill is derived from Andriessen.
In New Amsterdam he had acquired a house and lot from Hendrick Kip, August 29, 1651. It lay northeast of fort Amsterdam." Under date of October 5, 1655, we find that he was taxed fi. 20 for this house and lot.
In May, 1655, before the court of the Burgomasters and Schepens in New Amsterdam, Roeloff Jansen, a butcher, appeared and made a complaint against Christiaen Barentsen, attorney for Andriessen. Jansen had leased a house and some land belonging to Andriessen who was to give him some cows. But the house was not tight" and "not enclosed," and the cows were missing. might still suffer. The defendant, as attorney for Andriessen, replied that it was not his fault that the demand had not been complied with according to the contract. He requested time to. write to his principal about it. The Court granted him a month's time in which to do this. In due time, however, the court ruled that Andriessen should make the necessary repairs.
Some years later, Simon Clasen Turck started a suit against Andriessen, of which we shall let the court minutes of New Amsterdam speak:
[August 19, 16591. "Simon Turck, pltf., vs. Dirck van Schelluyne as att'y of Albert Andriessen, deft. Deft, in default. Symon Turck produces in Court in writing his demand against Albert Andriessen concluding, that the attachment on the two cows grazing with Wolfert Webber shall stand good and have its full effect, until the said Albert Andriessen shall have paid him his arrears to the amount of fi. 2, sent to him by Joris Jans Rapalje Ao. 1649, the 3d Septr. in the absence of Pieter Cornelissen, millwright, decd., not accounted for nor made good by him." The attachment on the cows is declared valid by the Court.22
[August 19]. "Dirck van Schelluyne in quality as att'y for Albert Andriessen Noorman, answers demand of Symon Clasen Turck. The court orders copy to be furnished to party to answer thereunto at the next Court day."23
[September 2]. "Symon Clasen Turck replies to answer of Dirck van Schelluyne, att'y of Albert Andriessen. Court orders copy to be furnished to party to rejoin at the next court day,"24
[September 23]. "Tielman van Vleeck as att'y for Turck requests by petition, that Sybout Clazen shall be ordered to deliver by the next Court day his papers used against the abovenamed Symon Turck; also that Dirck van Schelluyne, att'y of Albert Andriessen, shall be ordered to rejoin to Symon Turck's reply.
Apostille : Petitioner's request is granted, and parties shall be ordered to prosecute their suit by the next court day.
"On date 17th January 1660, has Dirck van Schelluyne furnished me Secretary Joannes Nevius, his rejoinder, and demand in reconvention, as attorney of Albert Andriessen against Tielman van Vleec, att'y of Symon Clazen Turck, also rejoinder of Abra ham Verplanck against ditto Van Vleeck as substitute of Anthony Clasen More: Whereupon the President of the Burgomasters and Schepens ordered: Copy hereof to be furnished to party, and parties are ordered to exchange their papers with each other and to produce their deductions and principal intendit by inventory on the next Court day."
On January 22, 1660, the Burgomasters and Schepens dismissed the "pltfs. suit instituted herein" and condemned him to pay the costs incurred in this suit.
But a few days later, on January 28, 1660, it rendered the following decision: "Burgomasters and Schepens of the City of Amsterdam in N: Netherland having considered, read and reread the vouchers, documents and papers used on both sides in the suit between Tielman van Vleeck attorney of Simon Clasen Turck, (as husband and guardian of Merretje Pieters, daughter of the dec[eas]d Pieter Cornelissen, millwright, and his lawful heir, as well for himself as representing herein the orphan child of Tryntie Pieters, deceased daughter of said Pieter Cornelissen) pltf. against Dirck Van Schelluyne, attorney of Albert Andriessen Noorman, residing at Fort Orange, deft. relative to and concerning two hundred guilders, which Symon Clasen Turck is demanding from Albert Andriesen for so much, that Albert Andriesen has received from Jorsey in the absence of Pieter Comelissen, millwright, dated 3rd September, 1649, gone to Virginia and not computed by him nor made good as appears by contract made between Albert Andriessen and Symon Clasen Turck by the intermediation of - Corlear and Dirck van Schelluyne according to acte thereof executed before D: V. Hamel, Secretary of the Colony of Reinselaars Wyck, dated 27th September, 1658; and whereas the words of the contract read as follows :-
' Firstly, Symon Turck shall collect, receive, retain and dispose of as his own according to his pleasure, all outstanding debts receivable, wherever they be; all effects and goods found in the house of the deceased Pieter Cornelissen, whether belonging to him individually or to his Company or Association; On the other hand, Albert Andriesen assumes himself all the debts payable where and to whomsoever they may be, relating to their partnership, whether these stand in the name of Pieter Cornelissen or his own name. promises to release Symon Turck from all claims relating hereunto.' - having looked into, examined and weighed everything material, Burgomasters and Schepens find it right, that the pltf's demand be dismissed, inasmuch as they find, that the two hundred guilders were not to be received, but were paid several years since to Joris Rapalj e, who sent the same to Albert Andriesen Noorman and are accordingly not payable to the estate of Pieter Cornelissen, but whenever Symon Turck or his attorney can prove that, at the time of the settlement of accounts and writing of the contract, Albert Andriesen Noorman notified Symon Turck, that he should receive the 11. 200., hereinbefore in question, from Sybout Clasen, then Albert Andriesen shall give and pay the above mentioned fi. 200., with costs, and in default of proof the pltf. is condemned in the costs of the suit. Regarding the demand in reconvention about certain planks, no disposition can be made therein as the same is moved according to the Lites Contest atio. Thus done and adjudged by the Burgomaster and Schepens of the City of Amsterdam in New Netherland as above.
" Adj. as above
" Martin Kregier."
The court minutes under date of June 8, 1660, regarding this litigation, state:
" On petition of Tielman Van Vleeck, attorney for Symon Clasen Turck, wherein he requests that the Court may not only examine, but also expedite the solution given by him relative to the fulfillment of the interlocutory judgment pronounced 28th January last, it is ordered :-Copy of the solution shall be furnished to party to answer thereunto at the next Court day.
And under date of January 29, 1661, the minutes pertaining to this case read: "On the petition of Tielman van Vleeck, agent of Symon Clasen Turck, wherein he requests, as Albert Andriesen Noorman remains in default, to answer the solution given in to Court on the 8th of June 1660, that the above named Albert Andries(e)n shall in contumacy be condemned to pay him petitioner the computed two hundred guilders remaining due to him; Whereupon was ordered: The petitioner shall notify his party hereof according to law before June 5, 1662.
" Appeared before me Robert Livingston, secretary etc., and in presence of the honorable Messieurs Philip Schuyler and Dirck Wessells, commisaries etc., Albert Andriese Bratt, who acknowledged that he is well and truly indebted and in arrears to Mr. Nicolaus Van Renselaer, director of colony of Renselaerswyck, in the sum of 3,956 guilders, as appears by the books of the colony of Renselaerswyck, growing out of the part rent for the mill and land; which aforesaid 3,956 guilders the mortgagor, to the aforenamed Mr. Director or to his successors, promise to pay, provided that whatever he, the mortgagor shall make appear to have been paid thereon shall be deducted: pledging therefor, specially, the produce of his orchard, standing behind the house which the mortgagor now possesses, from which produce of the orchard he promises to pay in rent during life twenty guilders in patroon's money in apples, and generally pledging his person and estate, personal and real, present and future, nothing excepted; submitting the same to the force of all laws and judges to promote the payment thereof in due time, if need be, without loss or cost.
"Done in Albany, without craft or guile, on the 30th of October, 1677.
"Aalbert Andriess Brat.
"Philip Schuyler.
"Dirck Wessels.
"Acknowledged before me,
"Robt. Livingstone, Secr.
Albert Andriessen died June 7, 1686
anne gutierrez added this on 11 Sep 2010
mezzojess originally submitted this to Jessica Family Tree on 25 Sep 2007Source: Olive Tree Genealogy
 |
Bradt's Sawmill on Normanskill Creek
Bradt's Sawmill on Normanskill Creek anne gutierrez added this on 11 Sep 2010 aten0000 originally submitted this to Ward Family Tree on 3 Jul 2010 |
|
1584 - 1613 (29 years)
[1, 2, 3] 
